The more I analyze the Dylann Roof situation, the more convinced I become that Dylann Roof does not exist as such. Certainly, he exists in the way that all things “exist.” He is a corporeal being, flesh and blood. I believe that he did the things that he is accused of doing, and these accusations can easily be proven. When I say “Dylann Roof does not exist,” I mean that he does not exist as an autonomous, independent actor with a coherent philosophy or a vision that he was truly driven to bring to fruition. I mean that he exists purely as a bugaboo, a spectre created and commissioned by elites to serve a specific purpose: namely to ignite a race war through the manipulation of a credulous and histrionic populace, ending with government seizure of more power than previously could have been imagined.
The obviousness of Dylann Roof has been a niggling thought in the back of my head ever since the horrific events that took place in Charleston. He is the perfect, white trash, Confederate flag waving, homicidal, trailer dwelling, Southern racist. Perfectly dysfunctional, perfectly low-IQ. Too perfect to be true. He fits too flawlessly within the narrative of the Left, that the U.S. is an intractably racist country, so evil that it incubates people just like Dylann Roof; so evil that it must be fundamentally transformed. When I heard that he’d penned a “manifesto,” my doubts were confirmed. As I read the manifesto, it struck me: Dylann Roof is Emmanuel Goldstein. His “manifesto” is the latter day Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism. Roof is who we are supposed to direct our invective towards during this current media cycle, this Two Minutes Hate brought to life. He exists to strike terror into the hearts of simpletons and to put the awakened, the Remnants, on notice. Dylann Roof is essentially a figment, his manifesto a contrivance disseminated by the powers that be to both convince and obscure. To convince the idiocracy of impending doom and to obscure the true agenda of the elites.
For starters, the manifesto is an unexpectedly decent read. Some typos, but I suspect that’s just for the sake of authenticity. From what we’re told about Roof, he is a drug addled, spottily educated, high school dropout. From what we can see, he clearly isn’t too bright. Yet, the document is incredibly coherent.
I was not raised in a racist home or environment. Living in the South, almost every White person has a small amount of racial awareness, simply beause [sic] of the numbers of negroes [sic] in this part of the country. But it is a superficial awareness. Growing up, in school, the White and black kids would make racial jokes toward each other, but all they were were jokes. Me and White friends would sometimes would watch things that would make us think that “blacks were the real racists” and other elementary thoughts like this, but there was no real understanding behind it.
The event that truly awakened me was the Trayvon Martin case. I kept hearing and seeing his name, and eventually I decided to look him up. I read the Wikipedia article and right away I was unable to understand what the big deal was. It was obvious that Zimmerman was in the right. But more importantly this prompted me to type in the words “black on White crime” into Google, and I have never been the same since that day. The first website I came to was the Council of Conservative Citizens. There were pages upon pages of these brutal black on White murders. I was in disbelief. At this moment I realized that something was very wrong. How could the news be blowing up the Trayvon Martin case while hundreds of these black on White murders got ignored? [Emphasis added]
So he types in “black on white crime” into Google and the first site he comes to coincidentally is the Council of Conservative Citizens, and not Wikipedia or a government website featuring crime statistics? Interesting.
The manifesto reads like pieces of it was lifted from every alternative right, human biodiversity, and white nationalist site on the internet. Dylann Roof is very aware, and his references are quite interdisciplinary. We have HBD:
Negroes have lower Iqs, lower impulse control, and higher testosterone levels in generals. These three things alone are a recipe for violent behavior. If a scientist publishes a paper on the differences between the races in Western Europe or Americans, he can expect to lose his job. There are personality traits within human families, and within different breeds of cats or dogs, so why not within the races?
And a socio-historical perspective:
In a modern history class it is always emphasized that, when talking about “bad” things Whites have done in history, they were White. But when we lern [sic] about the numerous, almost countless wonderful things Whites have done, it is never pointed out that these people were White. Yet when we learn about anything important done by a black person in history, it is always pointed out repeatedly that they were black. For example when we learn about how George Washington carver was the first nigger smart enough to open a peanut.
Again, too agitprop. Too perfectly narrative. A designer crisis, with each piece perfectly fitted to its purpose. Partially to discredit the right, partially to support the “white people are racist” narrative, partially to foment racial unrest, completely to allow government to tighten its already viselike grip over the nation. This we can already see. Of course, the President’s claims are patently and provably false, but that is no matter. Truth is not the purpose behind any of this. As the feeble minded and unaware everywhere are fixated on this tragedy, the elites continue to make moves, and continue to assail our liberties.