The “choice” to be an evolutionary dead end has become the way in which leftist sophisticates signal their progressive credentials. The “child-free” set, ranging from the apathetically disinterested to the rabidly antagonistic tend to spout Malthusian justifications for the obliteration of their genetic heritage: that the world doesn’t need more people, that the world is overpopulated, that there aren’t sufficient resources to support more human life, that human reproduction damages the ecology and so forth. They are united in their view, whether conscious or unconscious, of Earth as a distant hypothetical or as an inherent value, divorced of its life sustaining function. Put simply, these suicidalists’ primary concern is for the Earth and not for the life that it fosters and sustains. Their endgame is Earth’s depopulation so that the planet will be free of the scourge that is humankind.
These assertions are seldom backed by science and are often contradicted in the face of technological advancements that both minimize human impact on the planet while facilitating demographic booms, and catastrophic events like wars and disease that tend to naturally act as culling forces upon the global population, periodically resetting the course of human events. Ironically (or perversely), the mere existence of these anti natal, highly educated, self sterilizing hipsterfucks demonstrates just how inaccurate Malthus was in his prediction that boom times will lead to exponential increases in reproduction. As the West in general and Europe in particular is coming to realize, conditions of plenty oftentimes lead to substantial demographic collapse. Industrialized Asian countries are being confronted with this grim reality as well. As it turns out, wealth and education are the most effective forms of birth control, as the world’s brahmins spay and neuter themselves while the world’s feeble minded reproduce with alacrity and vigor. Without a doubt, the ugly dysgenic chickens will be coming home to roost quite soon.
At base, the anti natalists are anti human and self hating. They are fundamentally selfish and and uninteresting. Attempting to “find oneself” in career or vacations to the Caribbean or backpacking through Europe are exercises in futility; masturbatory pursuits with no value beyond the immediate thrill of adventure, providing only an ersatz semblance of fulfillment for a fleeting moment. The left is rapidly devolving into a death cult interested only in total self annihilation and in the complete annihilation of humankind. There is nothing glamorous about being anti life. There is nothing sophisticated about choosing not to give life. Though many useful idiots will look upon this “lifestyle choice” as liberation it is nothing more than slavery to nihilism.
As Christoper Cantwell says: “I’m thoroughly convinced that our social and political provlems extend well beyond “left versus right” or “statist versus anarchist.” This has now reached a point where the war is between people who enjoy the world and people who want to see its utter destruction.” His conclusion is correct. The Left hates life; fecundity is anathema to it. Far from being conscientious abstainers, the “child-free” clique are genetic abortions, dupes who are nothing more than sorry pawns in a game far beyond their comprehension.